Difference between Rest & SOAP Integration in ServiceNow?

[NILAML]

Hello everyone,
I'm trying to understand the key differences between REST and SOAP integration methods in ServiceNow. Could someone explain how they differ in terms of implementation, performance, security, and use cases within the ServiceNow platform?
Any guidance or real-world examples would be greatly appreciated!

[Sanjay191]

Hello @NILAML 

When integrating external systems with ServiceNow, both REST and SOAP are common protocols, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Here's a comparison between the two, focusing on aspects like implementation, performance, security, and use cases:

1. Implementation

• REST:

  • Lightweight and easier to set up: REST is often simpler to implement compared to SOAP. ServiceNow provides out-of-the-box REST API support, and you can create RESTful endpoints using the ServiceNow REST API explorer.
  • Data format flexibility: REST primarily uses JSON, but it can also support XML and other formats. This makes it more versatile in terms of data interchange.
  • Stateless communication: Each request from a client to a server must contain all the information the server needs to fulfill that request.
  • Out-of-the-box REST APIs: ServiceNow provides a variety of REST APIs, such as Table APIs, Import APIs, and Scripted REST APIs.

• SOAP:

  • More complex setup: SOAP involves working with WSDL (Web Services Description Language) files, which can be more challenging to configure than REST. ServiceNow allows you to create SOAP web services and consume external SOAP services, but it requires more effort.
  • Strictly XML: SOAP uses XML for message formatting, which is more verbose compared to JSON. The format is rigid, and adhering to the SOAP standard can lead to larger data payloads.
  • ServiceNow Web Service: ServiceNow offers SOAP-based web services like the Table API and Import Set API.

2. Performance

• REST:

  • Faster and more efficient: Due to its stateless nature and support for JSON, REST is generally more efficient, lightweight, and faster than SOAP. JSON payloads are typically smaller than XML, reducing the data size and improving performance.
  • Better suited for mobile applications: REST is often preferred for mobile apps or applications where performance and quick data processing are essential.

• SOAP:

  • Slower due to XML overhead: The use of XML makes SOAP more verbose, leading to larger message sizes and longer processing times.
  • Performance hit with complex data: When transferring large or complex data, SOAP can be slower compared to REST.

3. Security

• REST:

  • HTTPS for encryption: REST mainly relies on HTTPS for securing communication, and it supports authentication mechanisms like OAuth, Basic Authentication, and API keys.
  • Less built-in security: REST doesn’t have as many security features as SOAP, so extra security configurations might be needed.

• SOAP:

  • WS-Security: SOAP has built-in support for WS-Security, which includes features like encryption, digital signatures, and authentication. This makes SOAP more robust for scenarios where higher security is essential.
  • Secure token-based authentication: SOAP can handle complex authentication scenarios, such as Single Sign-On (SSO), more seamlessly than REST.

4. Use Cases

• REST:

  • Ideal for lightweight and high-performance integrations: REST is perfect for situations where speed is a priority, such as mobile apps, web applications, and real-time integrations.
  • Standard ServiceNow APIs: Use REST for integrations with other systems or platforms (e.g., querying ServiceNow tables, creating incidents, user data synchronization).

• SOAP:

  • Complex, enterprise-level integrations: SOAP is better suited for legacy systems or integrations that require strict compliance with protocols and complex security needs.
  • Integration with legacy systems: When working with older systems that still rely on SOAP web services, ServiceNow can consume these services using the SOAP framework.
  • Scenarios requiring advanced security: Applications requiring extensive security features (encryption, signing, etc.) often use SOAP.

Real-World Examples

• REST Example: Integrating a ServiceNow instance with a modern ticketing system (e.g., JIRA) using REST APIs. The REST interface makes it easy to push or pull data in JSON format, enabling real-time ticket updates and seamless communication between systems.
• SOAP Example: Connecting ServiceNow to a legacy ERP system (like SAP) that only supports SOAP. In this case, the integration uses SOAP web services to ensure secure and structured data communication, often with complex authentication mechanisms.

Conclusion

In ServiceNow, REST is the preferred method for most modern integrations due to its simplicity, speed, and flexibility. However, SOAP remains relevant for specific scenarios where stringent security requirements or legacy system integrations are involved. Consider the needs of your integration (performance, security, and complexity) when deciding which protocol to use.

Please check below article also for Soap and Rest  

https://dev.to/sophiasemga/leveraging-soap-apis-for-outbound-integration-a-step-by-step-guide-245c
https://www.basicoservicenowlearning.in/2020/01/servicenow-integration-using-rest.html#google_vignet...


If my answer has helped with your question, please mark my answer as accepted solution and give a thumb up.
Thank You